First of all, I'd like to send a special shout out to the C19 Forum, who picked up on my "North and South" thread where I ask Richard Armitage to give me a fucking break. Please.
In honor of them, i've created a new category for these types of posts: Nutella with a Spoon.
This is meant to epitomize all the things I do in the privacy of my nest that are so square, they would curdle the kefir of my more hardcore friends.
For the record, I'm as happy watching "Naked Lunch" as I am English costume dramas. But sometimes, you just need to see Ciaran Hinds smolder for Samantha Morton. You really do. A typewriter that turns into a bug that talks out of its anus is great, don't get me wrong. David Cronenberg, I love you. It's just sometimes you need Richard Armitage to smell a flower and take off his cravat. You really do.
However, I have a problem. I've begun to treat North and South like pornography -- I fast forward through the narrative scenes just to get to the love story. But this tendency of mine has exposed a real hypocrisy in my personality. It's making me think I'm some sort of radical fraud.
The B plot in this case is about a very smart laborer who organizes a union, and then the union holds a city-wide strike, and then the strike is broken by the factory owners -- one of which is Richard Armitage, the person I'm fast-forwarding to get to. I'm a history major with political scientist parents, and my personal politics are about as far to the left as a person can go without decamping to the farm and starting a family folk-band. And still I'm swallowing union-busing and hard core market-fixing capitalism, simply because it comes in the Richard Armitage package? Really, what would Karl Marx think?
Where does this leave me? Well, it leaves me having thought about wealthy industrialist John Thornton for half an hour. Which means now I have no choice but to watch "North and South" again.
Damn you, Richard Armitage. Your point.

